This is the most commonly asked question that I get, “Why don’t you believe in a God?”. Note my use of the word “can’t” instead of “don’t” in the title of this blog. We live in a world where the vast majority of the population believes in some sort of a supernatural deity in one form or another. This makes me part of the minority who doesn’t. However, as I don’t believe in one, that means I must have my reasons. There must be some critical evidence, some vital piece of information or resource(s) that are available to 90% of the population but not to me. I must not have access to that information which might convince me of a divine God(s) and it’s existence.

The evidence for God must be so overwhelming to convince 90% of the Earths population of his existence, and let us assume that the other 10% of us do have access to the same evidence as the believers do in God, but we refuse not to accept it. This, to my mind anyway, concludes that, in the face of presented theological evidence, it’s not that I don’t believe in a God, but that I can’t believe in a God even when the evidence has been presented to me by a believer. Let’s look at a hypothetical conversation between me and a theist (a person of belief);

Theist: Why don’t you believe in a God?
Me: I can’t.
Theist: Why can’t you?
Me: Because I can’t! The evidence you have presented is not good enough to believe in one.

The lack of evidence presented by a theist isn’t the only reason why I can’t believe in a God, there are a number of reasons why I can’t. My list of reasons is in no way thorough, but it should give you a good idea of my arguments against the existence of God.
The reasons are listed below (in no particular order):

    1. Coincidence of inherited faith
There are two assumptions to make here that 1) my birth to Muslim parents was purely coincidental and there was no divine intervention or plan for me to be born to Muslim parents, or 2) that it was planned by a supreme supernatural being that my birth should be to Muslim parents.

If we take 1) to be true, it just so happens, by sheer coincidence, that I was born to Muslim parents, and thus the direction my upbringing will take was obvious. I was to be brought up as a Muslim, believing in ‘La ilaha illal la hu, muhammadur rasullallah’ (‘There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger’). This was the doctrine that I was to follow from birth. As a young child, I had no choice but to follow this.

What if I had been born to Christian parents? Or Jewish parents? Or Hindu parents? Or Buddhist parents? Richard Dawkins puts this wonderfully in a Q and A section in 2006 during a lecture:

“If you were born in India, you’d be a Hindu. If you were brought up in Denmark in the time of the Vikings, you would be believing in Wotan and Thor. If you were born in classical Greece, you’d be believing in Zeus. If you were born in central Africa you would be believing in the Great JuJu up the mountain.” – Richard Dawkins.

It just so  happens that I was  born to Muslim parents, and my God was Allah. If I had been born to Hindu parent’s, I would have been worshipping Krishna, and then I would have believed that Krishna is the true God and all other non-hindu Gods were false.

If 2) happens to be true, that my birth to Muslim parents was pre-destined by a supreme being or God, then one must ask, “Why did I deserve such a privilege?”. Why was I the one chosen to be born into this correct and true religion? If God wanted me to be born into Islam, and give me this advantage, a big boost that will help me get in to heaven, why then deny this privilege and advantage to the other billions of babies born to non-Muslim parents? Why must they suffer the ills and wrongs of “false” religions and gods and seriously cut their chances of ever getting into heaven by worshipping the wrong type of god(s).

This to me, sounds like favouritism. God chooses some people over others based on criteria that only he knows. A baby born to non-muslim parents in some remote part of the world has no chance of discovering Islam and making it into the Muslim heaven.

    2. God’s morality
God has a strange way of showing love, compassion, and mercy. It is claimed God has power over everything. He can control nature and where he can prevent natural disasters, he also has the power to create them. If he controls the power to stop natural disasters, then why does he let them happen?

At this point, religious apologists say something that I find absolutely repulsive, that:

  1. God had a plan for the people who died
  2. These people paid the price for being sinful
  3. These people died so that others can see the dangers of disobeying God
  4. It’s a demonstration of God’s wrath so others maybe believe and go on the path of righteousness.

If you think I made that list up, think again. These are actual reasons that people have given me! Some very nice, honest, decent human beings say such vile and nasty things when they have to show loyalty to their religion. To think that an innocent young girl died in a flood, her body washed away miles from her house, drowning in water and in complete agony, that God at this point was thinking, “It’s ok for her to suffer like this because I’m trying to make a point”.

I refuse to believe in any God that has this sort of morality, and will definitely not worship something so gross and lacking in any moral decency. There should be NO excuse for any life, innocent or not, to be wasted in such a manner for the sake of other people’s salvation.

3. Absolute claim to truth
The Quran and the Hadiths claim that everything in the Quran is the absolute truth, and that it can never change. Our sense of morality has changed over time. We no longer think it is acceptable to keep slaves (A); to allow women half the rights of that given to men; adulterers and homosexuals to be severely punished or in some cases executed; and apostates to be killed.

(A) Regarding slaves

Surah 004 Verse 024
YUSUFALI: Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.

Also check out Quran (33:50), (23:5-6), (2:178) regarding ownership and treatment of slaves.

Religion with its bronze age scriptures can never change their texts. Even as when our societies evolve and we become a more enlightened species, the scriptures will still insist we keep to the same tribal morals and ethics that were considered the norm back in the days. We now consider child marriages to be a violation of human rights, and an ‘eye-for-an-eye’ punishments against human decency.

4. Contradictions in scripture
The claim by Muslim apologetics on the divinity of the Quran falls flat when you begin to see the many contradictions within its texts. They often claim that the absence of any contradictions in the holy scriptures is proof of its revelation by God to Muhammad. These people often have not fully read the Quran in a language they understand. If they did, they will begin to see one verse claiming one thing, then another one that completely contradicts it.

Will Christians enter Paradise or go to Hell? Sura 2:62 and 5:69 say “Yes”, Sura 5:72 (just 3 verses later) and 3:85 say “No”.
How merciful is Allah’s mercy? He has prescribed mercy for himself [6:12], yet he does not guide some, even though he could [6:35, 14:4].
What was man created from? A blood clot [96:1-2], water [21:30, 24:45, 25:54], “sounding” (i.e. burned) clay [15:26], dust [3:59, 30:20, 35:11], nothing [19:67] and this is then denied in 52:35, earth [11:61], a drop of thickened fluid [16:4, 75:37]

Source: Answering Islam.

These are just a few examples of the contradictions within the Quran. A Muslims response to such contradictions is that the verses should be read in context. The whole Quran is  arranged according to length of the Surahs, with the shortest at the beginning and the longest placed at the end. Every verse can be read in context, and you will still get the same meaning and end result.

It was these contradictions that to me was proof enough that such scripture could not have come from a divine revelation. The contradictions were consistent with what you would expect to find in something that was a product of human invention.

5. Scientific theory
I heard a lot of Muslims make claims that there is a lot of science in the Quran. What I realised was that it’s not the Quran that makes these claims, but rather desperate Muslim apologetics who try to find some defence against the advancements made by science that contradicts the existence of God and other supernatural powers. They see this as a direct threat to their beliefs, and desperately try to find verses in the Quran that they can interpret into anything remotely scientific. Take the following verses for example:

Does man think that We cannot assemble his bones? Nay, We are able to put together in perfect order the very tips of his fingers.
(Translation by Yusuf Ali: Surah 75:3-4)

Muslim apologetics say the above verse is shows the uniqueness of finger prints. Here, they themselves do not read the verse in the context of the previous and later verses.

I do call to witness the Resurrection Day; And I do call to witness the self-reproaching spirit: (Eschew Evil).
(Translation by Yusuf Ali: Surah 75:1-2)

After reading the first 2 verses that come before it, you soon find out that the Quran is actually talking about resurrection of the body, and that God can create the human again, including his bones and his fingers. There is also no mention of “finger prints” – just the tips of the fingers.

There are also many false claims made about salt and fresh water not mixing, the human embryo development, the shape of the Earth, the rotation of the Sun and the Moon, and the role of mountains. I have always been interested in the sciences, and always try to educated myself on how our natural world works. When I heard these “scientific” claims being made, it pushed me further to find out the real scientific explanations.

Suffice it to say, anyone who has read an A-Level science book on physics, biology and geology, would never accept the “miracles of the Quran” to have any scientific value.

6. Lack of evidence
When asked for evidence about God’s presence, you would normally be presented with personal experiences, anecdotes, and that fable “God won’t present to you because you don’t believe in him”. What utter potty. Religion makes counter-claims to science; laws of gravity can be suspended to allow humans to fly off and sometimes biology can allow virgins to give birth. These remarkable claims have no evidence to back themselves up, but instead we are to rely on the testimony of a few 6th century tribal ignorants from a desert of the middle-east.

7. Conditional love
Whilst a believer, I found it really odd that there was a condition attached to receiving heavenly rewards after you die. It did not matter if you had lived a good life full of good deeds as a decent human being, but if you didn’t accept God, then that was enough to condemn you to a lifetime in eternal hell.

My kindness, generosity, charity, good will, and good behaviour towards my fellow human beings and all things living were not enough if I didn’t prostate 5 times a day; if I didn’t fall on my knees and begged for forgiveness, and gave thanks to the almighty creator for giving me a brain and a mind to think for myself, to question my existence, but then punishing me for doing just that.

8. Dominion of men
It is no doubt that when the Quran was written, it was a world dominated by men. This was more true in the Arab world and in the tribal societies of the middle-east. The Quran speaks in most parts directly to men – “they”, “you”, “we”, “them” are words addressed to the male audience. At other parts it speaks to the reader in general. The odd time when it does refer to a woman, it is often to remind her to be obedient to the men.

Muslim apologetics at this point say the Quran needed to speak to the male population because they were the most influential, but this contradicts the claim that the Quran is universal and speaks to everyone; men and women.

We have moved forward in regards to female rights, and woman have now been empowered with the same rights as men in most countries and societies. If we are to follow the Quran with its unalterable scripture, we will fall back in our progress made for human rights, and women will once again find themselves losing out. This contradiction was enough for me start doubting in the “divine revelation”.

These were some of the reasons that made me question religion, but the biggest influence has been the “age of reason” – the ability to look at supernatural claims with skepticism and credulity, and questioning everything.




Last Tuesday, I got the chance to see Sam Harris in conversation with Richard Dawkins at Oxford’s Sheldonian theatre, at an event organised by the British Humanist Society called ‘Who says science has nothing to say about morality?’

Sam had been in the UK for a couple of weeks promoting his new book ‘The Moral Landscape’. This was my first time seeing him and Richard live so I was really excited, and I wasn’t disappointed with my evening.

Setting from London, I got there at least 2 hours early, and I’m glad I did. Roaming around Oxford centre and the venue where the talk was to take place, I caught Richard Dawkins on his bicycle coming into the theatre. I wasn’t going to let this opportunity go past me so whilst he was locking his bike to the railings I nervously said, “Professor Dawkins? I’m a big fan sir, and a great admirer of your work.” He was very pleased to hear that and said “Thank you”.

I continued, “I’m a very recent atheist and an ex-muslim, and your books and lectures on YouTube helped me a lot.” He said something like, “Oh, well done. I’m very pleased to hear that.” After exchanging a few more words, I thought this was the perfect moment to ask him my question. I asked him if he knew of Dr. Zakir Naik. He said he didn’t. I explained who he was; that he enjoyed a following of millions of Muslims and considering the high profile of Islam in the media right now, would he ever consider going on the Muslim channel Dr. Naik started and debate him live. Professor Dawkins response was simply, “No, I don’t debate Muslims.”

I’m sure he would have had more to say and would have given me a reason as to why not, but he had to go into the theatre for his talk. I can take a guess however why he wouldn’t. Richard Dawkins is an acclaimed scientist who uses logic, reasoning, scientific theory and proof and evidence for his arguments, whilst all Dr. Naik has is his limited knowledge of science, flawed logic and reasoning, and his desperate attempt at clinging onto an archaic scripture and using that as his only means of defence. So you can see, not exactly a fair fight.

But I hope one day, for purely entertainment value, Richard Dawkins gets to debate Dr Naik. I can guarantee that debate will attract millions of viewers worldwide. Should make for a good show!

Also, I got The God Delusion signed by Richard Dawkins and The End of Faith by Sam Harris. Got a “welcome to the club” from Sam Harris after I told him of my recent deconversion.

After my public denouncing of religion, I’m getting a lot of e-mails and messages from people; some are encouraging and supportive, whilst some are just attacks (“You’re an idiot.” said one random tweeter), and others are mainly people asking questions. It’s a major life changing decision I’ve taken to denounce my religion and become an atheist, people are naturally curious as to know why I’ve done it.
So these Q&A posts will contain the questions that I usually get along with my response. Most of these are just copy + paste from my replies, and as I also use my phone for sending messages, they may contain some spelling mistakes and grammatical errors due to the limiting keyboard of a touchscreen phone. So I hope those can be forgiven, but the content can be appreciated.

[Question] You do know a lot of the science can be found in the Quran?

[Answer] First let’s get the false pre-assumption out the way that Mecca at that time was completely ignorant of any knowledge. Mecca was a busy hub for trade and people from the surrounding countries did cross through it very regularly, and with them not only they brought spices and other goods to trade, but also ideas, known knowledge on science, myths and philosophies (mainly from Egyptian and Greek philosophers).

The science argument comes up time and again, and I disagree when people say there is science in the Quran. All the “scientific” claims made by the scriptures (all holy books from all religions, not just Quran) have been refuted and debunked many times; The flat earth, 5 stages of embryo development, the mountains preventing earthquakes, the water cycle, the 2 different waters not mixing, mention of an “atom”, the earth rotating around the sun, earth being round (like an ostriches egg), the list goes on and on..

All the above claims have been refuted many times conclusively by scientists. It is only recently when the Muslim scholars and religious apologists found themselves up against modern science trying to disapprove the holy scriptures, that they started to find meaning in the ambiguous verses and relating them to science.

Consider this.. there are accepted 6346 number of verses in the Quran, and from that, some have been used up to explain science. The others are just about history, the battles, and other non “science” things. Considering that some of these verses have been used to explain science only in the last 50 years, one wonders in 500 years time, when mankind has made so much advancement in science, will the religious apologetics still have enough verses left in the Quran to explain what we learn in 500 years time?? Gives you something to think doesn’t it 🙂

A Culturally Inherited Faith

Posted: April 16, 2011 in Islam, Reasoning

Please, next time somebody insists on calling a child a Muslim child, or a Christian child or a Jewish child, do correct them. That infant has no idea what religion is, what it means and what it teaches.

In Islam it is believed that every child is born a Muslim:

Surah Al-A’raaf, Chapter 7, Verses 172-173;

Allah explained that when He created Adam, He caused all of Adam’s descendants to come into existence and took a pledge from them saying, Am I not your Lord? To which they all replied, ” Yes, we testify to It:’

The Prophet Muhammad said, “No babe is born but upon Fitra (as a Muslim). It is his parents who make him a Jew or a Christian or a Polytheist.” (Sahih Muslim, Book 033, Number 6426)

A baby born to Christian parents remains a Muslim until it is “led astray” by its parents towards Christianity. That baby will grow up believing in the Christian faith and many of its views will favour the Christian ideology; the holy trinity, the crucifixion of Jesus and his status as a messenger of God or as the son of God.

That child, say for the sake of the argument is a boy, has grown to become a Christian man. According to the Quran that man can only go to heaven on the day of judgement if he is willing to pay a tax; possibly in the form of submission.

Then what about a child born to atheist parents? Or a child born in a culture or part of the planet where the Abrahamic religion has not yet spread? What about a Hindu child? An apologetic[1] will say that it becomes the persons responsibility to seek out the true religion i.e. Islam, and if he doesn’t, well then, that’s his own fault and deserves to go to hell because he denied one true god and didn’t accept Muhammad as his messenger.

Imagine a poor child in India born to illiterate Hindu parents, in a village that has cut off all communications with the outside world. An ancient village and its occupants who have survived for thousands of years in a remote part of the country where the Abrahamic religions never reached. What are the chances that that young child will get to learn about other religions, whether its Christianity, Judaism, or Islam?

Not just India, but there are many examples where a person has no means to educate himself on the different religions except on the religion of his parents. He is most likely to follow the religion of the community and culture that he has been brought up in. It’s a cultural religion that he has inherited. Does that man deserve an eternal suffering in hellfire? Here, an apologetic will say: ‘God will let him in heaven because of his innocence, his backward culture, and the difficulty of him growing up in a region of the planet where he could not be exposed to Islam. Therefore, God will forgive him and grant him a place in heaven.’

I say, if that was the case, then why not simply say it in the Quran? Why say that a person who does not believe in God will be punished?

Surah Al-Tawba, Chapter 9, Verse 28;

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

– Translated by Yusuf Ali


Islamic apologists say there is no compulsion in Islam. However, if you’re a child born to Muslim parents and in to a strict culture with Islamic ideology, the religion is compulsory for you because your situation demands it. You have no choice but to accept it. It is compulsory because if you refuse it, you become an outcast. You will face resistance from your parents and then from the community. This resistance can even take shape in the form of real physical abuse and threat.

And do I need to remind you what the punishment is for apostasy? It’s death in case you were wondering.

[1]apologetic – is the discipline of defending a position (usually religious) through the systematic use of reason.

Conclusion to My Book

Posted: April 16, 2011 in Islam, Personal
Tags: ,

The problem with starting a new literature project is deciding where to begin, or even how to. Where exactly is the beginning? If it’s an autobiography, do I start from my childhood with a little mini-bio about myself? Well that’s a bit boring isn’t it?

Let’s start from the end; which I’m sure is an inevitable conclusion to this new and “brave” endeavour, surely for me as you will find out from the content of this blog.

So the ending begins like this;

And so, therefore, this is the reason for my recent conversion and complete acceptance to atheism. I hope you found my reasoning both logical and rational, and I hope in presenting my reasoning to you, you have come to accept that maybe there is an another alternative, if not the only alternative to religion and faith; an alternative that provides a much more evolved sense of morality, ethics, understanding of our own and our planets existence, and the acceptance of mutual benefits for peace and tolerance for all the wide range of lifeforms that we all share this blue rock in the abyss of space with.

I would imagine if I ever wrote a book, that’s how I would end it. That conclusion to my yet unwritten book is what I assume would be about, much or less.

Well there you have it. Now you know. I guess this is my first public acceptance of my decision to base my life around science, logic, critical thinking, reasoning, and rationality, and not on some old superstition and archaic scripture.

If you are a person of faith, whether you are Jewish, Christian or Muslim, I have no doubt you would have been offended by my post. You probably wanted to stop reading a long time ago but you didn’t. Instead you kept on reading, for that I thank you. If you are willing to keep an open mind and read further, you will see through my reasoning, through my critical thinking and logic, and also through my presentation of scientific facts, data and theory, that maybe the idea of atheism isn’t too evil after all. Hopefully, you’ll get to see that rational thinking provides a very liberating alternative to religion.

I’m not here to preach or to convert, but instead all I want to do is provide you with something to think about, something to engage you, in free thinking.

Even though I said earlier a mini-bio would be boring, but I think it is necessary, but I will keep this brief. I was born a Muslim child, which later on I come to realise that that is a completely silly notion; a Muslim child? Is there such a thing as a Muslim child? Or a Christian child? Or a Jewish child?

No. There isn’t.

A child is born without religion. A child is born to parents of a particular faith if they have one. In my case, I was a child born to Muslim parents. I grew up then, as a child with the Muslim faith entrusted upon him. I say entrusted because that’s exactly what children are subjected to. They are too young to understand religion and what religion is. But if they are born to Muslim parents, then the parents will bring the child up believing in the Islamic faith. In a typical Islamic family, and mostly in both the other Abrahamic religions; Judaism and Christianity, children will follow the faith of their parents. They will not know any difference. They are indoctrinated with the ideologies taken from the the scriptures of their parent’s religion. They will grow up believing that their religion is the only religion that is true and all others are false. They will believe that they do not have a choice to reject that faith and leave it, and if they leave it, the deepest level of hell gets reserved for them where they will forever burn in eternity. I will touch more on this subject later.

However, I left. I embraced science instead of superstition; I embraced logic instead of irrational thought and ideology; I embraced an evolved sense of morality based on the basic principle of what is right and what is wrong, what is harmful and what isn’t, and not told what is moral by some archaic scripture written at a time of ignorance. I would like to believe that as human beings we have changed from the times of the dark ages and have changed our morals and ethics for the better.

In the coming chapters, I will present you with some of my reasoning that won’t be hard to understand and accept by any free thinking mind, and I hope you will read and keep an open mind through it all. If I offend, then that’s too bad. Religion, like with anything else; politics, TV programs, books and authors, should not be exempt from criticism . Stick around. In my next chapters I will explain why.